Away from blogging and then back

2007 December 1
by Jim

Sometimes I wonder why I even bother blogging. I barely have (if any at all) any writing skills whatsoever. I lack the lexicon to describe a particular concept or to expound on a topic.For example, there’s this interesting post in Marketing Profs that I got off Twitter. The post written by Eileen Fogel asks the question whether marketing is just a form of trickery, steering the consumers perception of a product whether or not the product is able to deliver what it promises. Well, what the marketer promises.It took me an accumulated three hours of figuring the right way to present the query. I eventually gave up, realizing I couldn’t put into words my fascination with the topic.Another link that I also gave up on commenting about is Penelope Trunk’s “9 Ways to Think About Linking In a Blog Post.” Here, the Brazen Careerist lists the different reasons why a blogger would put links in a blog post. For me personally, linking is a form of ‘thank you’ to the blogger for writing a post that has me excited or intrigued.I’m attracted to Twitter because of the 140-character limit. You have to be short and concise. To the point. Suits me well. The character limit has a downside.It causes me to Twitter-spam often.It’s probably annoying a lot of my followers. I am trying to cut down on the T-spam. The only release I can think of is blogging. Which, of course, brings us back to the initial conundrum…

DRM’ed books? WTF?!?

2007 November 29
by Jim

Ten Lessons in Innovation from Amazon’s Kindle wasn’t much of an interesting read for me. What caught my attention was comment #3

I’m also not a huge fan of the idea of DRM on books.

Wait. Most pundits agree that DRM may be bad for the music industry yet here comes Amazon and starts adding DRM on books.

I know that Amazon had to figure out a way to protect the authors’ content from being freely distributed but why do I get the feeling that this is going to bite Amazon’s butt later?

I may be wrong.We’ll see.

Of books and the internet

2007 November 28
by Jim

It’s great to be listening to The-Gang-formerly-known-as-The-Gillmor-Gang again. For those who haven’t heard The Gang before, when you first listen in, you’ll get the impression that what’s going on is just noise.

It’s true that they can be a bit noisy at times (speaking over each other and Jason Calacanis marketing or doing an ad in the middle of a show) but I consider the noise as meaningful noise. Their tendency to be a bit argumentative brings a lot in terms of quality to the conversation.

The Gang is all about conversation. A noisy conversation.

Reckless punditry, as Saul Hansell puts it.

What I like most about The Gang is that it gives me a lot of things to think about.In Episode 2, as things were wrapping up the topic shifted to Google and the Open Handset Alliance.

Two things popped into my mind as I was listening to the podcast:

  1. Can the development of the Internet be compared to that of the invention of the book?
  2. How far can I push in trying to compare PCs three decades ago with that of the mobile handset of today?

I’d like to explore these questions further. I’m thinking of just going on a rant, THEN check out with Google has to say.

On eloquence

2007 November 28
by Jim

 My iMac’s Dictionary defines “eloquence” as:

Fluent or persuasive speaking or writing

I tried for many moons to become ‘eloquent’. I found out I couldn’t.I would describe the state of my speaking or writing as ‘il-loquence’ which is defined as ‘attempt to being fluent or persuasive in speaking or writing but results to being tiresome and boring to the point of becoming nauseating.’

Wither music

2007 November 28
by Jim


If you want to know why the music industry is struggling, let me give you Jermaine Dupri, president of Island Urban Records:

We let the consumer have too much of what they want, too soon, and we hurt ourselves.  

Let me see if I understand this, Mr. Dupri. What you’re saying is that giving the consumer the power to choose or decide, it’s a bad thing.Bad music is not the only thing destroying the music industry. It’s greed as well.    Thanks to MacDailyNews.

It was never about DRM

2007 November 28
tags: ,
by Jim

Peter Burrows wants to know: where’s the music explosion?

Pundits prophesied the resurrection of the music industry when EMI, Apple and Amazon started offering DRM-free music.

Those on top of soap boxes were bawling their heads out saying that DRM was killing the music industry. The restrictions were like shackles that prevented the music from spreading its wings and soaring to great new heights.

When you set it free, they will come.

And the music was set free.

But the foreshadowed explosion did not happen. The lightning bolt that was the unrestricted, unrestrained, DRM-free digital music did not jolt the near comatose Frankenstein’s monster back to life.

Perhaps it was never all about the DRM.

The only ones who cared deeply about DRM were the pundits and the geeks.

DRM is not the problem.

The ordinary consumer doesn’t give a rat’s ass about DRM.

The problem is the awful cacophony ‘musicians’ are spewing out these days.

Sleep. I need.

2007 November 27
by Jim

This explains why I’m forgetful and stupid lately.

Dr. Timothy J. Walter said getting adequate sleep may improve learning and memory. REM sleep helps in permanently storing the previous day’s experience in memory. Sleep deprivation causes lost opportunities in storing memory by failing to achieve REM sleep.

I should change my lifestyle so that I can get more sleep.

Or I should find a job where I can sleep all the time.

Or just sleep on my job.

Something new everyday

2007 November 27
by Jim

Sexcellent.

Slit and giggle.

Lust-one.

I asked; how do you use ’sexcellent’ in a sentence?

“Damn Babe, you were sexcellent last night. I must have cum 3 times!”

or

“Damn baby, you were so sexcellent last night. All slits and wiggles!”

You learn something new on Twitter everyday.

@boink

2007 November 27
tags: ,
by Jim

I like Twitter. It’s a communication and networking tool that’s easy to use and so easy to get into.

Twitter has evolved way past the tagline of “What are you doing?” People not only are posting their current activity but they are posting their thoughts and their feelings. They are also sharing links, websites, ideas.

Twitter is all about communication. It’s all about sharing.

Your community, your network is not restricted to the people you have met or you know personally. Your community can include the celebrities and luminaries of an industry or society you are interested in. Your network can include the people the celebrities you follow follow.

Following people the people you follow follow may be a self-serving attempt for some to pad their Twitter account. For me, this is not the case.

I am interested in what people has to say. From their everyday, run-of-the-mill activity to the earth- or web-shattering ideas that may very well change the way we live offline and online. The Twitters I follow offers me a slice, albeit a very thin one, of what’s happening in the world.

Communication. Sharing. Ideas.

Twitter can also give you a glimpse into the life of the luminaries in your own sphere of interests. That is, if they let you.

I believe almost 100% of all permissions to follow were accepted.

Within my sphere of interest, I am following Michael Arrington, Victor Cajiao, Jason Calacanis, Adam Christianson, Steve Gillmor, Seth Godin, John Gruber, Andy Ithnako, Guy Kawasaki, Leo Laporte, Steven Levy, Merlin Mann, Jeremiah Owyang, Bill Palmer, Chris Pirillo, and a whole lot more.

I’ve heard most of them in podcasts. I’ve read most their blogs or books. I consider them a superstar in their own right. They are good at what they do and I am glad they have allowed me to follow what they are doing.

But what has really impressed me the most about Twitter is the relationships that it builds.

It’s the “@” that builds these relationships.

My own experience was that of having put out a Tweet about some mundane thing and a person following me would reply: “@boink [message here].

What was most surprising and unexpected was getting replies from the most unexpected of Twitters; those who I consider as celebrities in my sphere of interests.

For me Twitter has broke down the barriers I put up myself.

I don’t expect all of the people I follow to ever “@boink…” me but knowing that a few do makes it all worth Twittering worth it.

Social networking

2007 November 27
by Jim

I’m into Twitter.

I’m into Facebook.

I’m into Friendster.

I don’t like MySpace.

I don’t like Orkut.

Not sold on Pownce.

Nor on Jaiku.